Ted Cruz for Senate
Under The Marble Arch
"I slept and dreamt that life was Joy.
I woke and saw that life was Duty.
I acted, and behold, Duty was Joy."
Rabindranath Tagore

"The skepticism about human rationality that science inspires should not be taken as support for authoritarianism or paternalism… On the contrary, it should render questionable all claims to wise and disinterested leadership, including those of America’s own altruistic progressive technocrats who propose policies to “nudge” the unenlightened masses into doing the right thing. It makes more sense to think of our leaders and intellectuals as half-crazed hooting howler monkeys — just like the rest of us."
Michael Lind, Salon, August 23,2011
“Seeing what isn’t there is half the job of being on the Left. The other half is changing what isn’t there through costly, intrusive, and ill-conceived initiatives (save 10 percent for keeping Charlie Rangel out of trouble).” -Abe Greenberg, October 9, 2009
“To date, what non-Obama voters see, and fear, is a candidate content to coast to the nomination and then conduct a blandly conservative campaign. They want a more substantive choice than that. They want to have it out over the worth or danger of Barack Obama’s ideas. They want the chance to ratify Washington’s enormous long-term claims on the country’s wealth, or decisively reject them." – Daniel Henninger, WSJ, July 21, 2011
Search Me
Powered by Squarespace
Books!
  • The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction
    The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction
    by J. Budziszewski
  • The Spiritual Combat Revisited
    The Spiritual Combat Revisited
    by Fr Jonathan Robinson, Jonathan Robinson
« Ugh-ly Art | Main | Mark Steyn: Gaulic Genius »
Sunday
Sep112005

Flight 93 Memorial: Offensive

Back when Mr. Siriano was still speaking to me (that would be yesterday, before I wrote the post below) he sent his latest editorial for the National Ledger.  It's an excellent piece about the design of the Flight 93 Memorial.  I watched the slide show and frankly found the design description with its phony, overwrought prose nauseating.  The architects' overwhelming emphasis is on the "Crescent of Embrace" and on integrating the design with Nature, to the point where they seem to be more interested in rehabilitating a strip mine; memorializing the victims and heroes is an afterthought   They went into great detail about the species of plants that they would use, but cynically exploited the general ignorance about the plants they intend to use.  For instance, they say weirdly, gratuitously:  "Rudbeckia hirta: blooms September 11"  Actually, Black-eyed Susans bloom all summer.  And of course, the "Crescent of Embrace" is planted entirely in Acer rubrum, you know, red maple, so on a given day in October you can fly over the memorial and see the world's biggest ad for the Red Crescent Society.  Remember?  The aid society founded by Clara al-Barton?  And don't fail to notice that there is a "Sacred Ground" area that is described as "the final resting place for the crew and passengers of Flight 93": not a single cross, Star of David, dove, flaming bush, nothing to indicate in what context most of the people resting there would define "sacred."  Just a big red crescent- for the hijackers who killed them.

Oh, yes: not a single American flag to be seen.

Mr. Siriano mentions that  The Ledger changed his original title, which was "Is it Time for a Crusade?"  A much better title, and the answer is yes.  I'm sending this and the Ledger article to my friends and Congressmen. 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.