Ted Cruz for Senate
Under The Marble Arch
"I slept and dreamt that life was Joy.
I woke and saw that life was Duty.
I acted, and behold, Duty was Joy."
Rabindranath Tagore

"The skepticism about human rationality that science inspires should not be taken as support for authoritarianism or paternalism… On the contrary, it should render questionable all claims to wise and disinterested leadership, including those of America’s own altruistic progressive technocrats who propose policies to “nudge” the unenlightened masses into doing the right thing. It makes more sense to think of our leaders and intellectuals as half-crazed hooting howler monkeys — just like the rest of us."
Michael Lind, Salon, August 23,2011
“Seeing what isn’t there is half the job of being on the Left. The other half is changing what isn’t there through costly, intrusive, and ill-conceived initiatives (save 10 percent for keeping Charlie Rangel out of trouble).” -Abe Greenberg, October 9, 2009
“To date, what non-Obama voters see, and fear, is a candidate content to coast to the nomination and then conduct a blandly conservative campaign. They want a more substantive choice than that. They want to have it out over the worth or danger of Barack Obama’s ideas. They want the chance to ratify Washington’s enormous long-term claims on the country’s wealth, or decisively reject them." – Daniel Henninger, WSJ, July 21, 2011
Search Me
Powered by Squarespace
  • The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction
    The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction
    by J. Budziszewski
  • The Spiritual Combat Revisited
    The Spiritual Combat Revisited
    by Fr Jonathan Robinson, Jonathan Robinson
« Peggy Sue...for Divorce | Main | Really, it's more of an olive drab... »

God is Great: A New Metric

 "My suffering is much, much less since I began to seek after my dream of being free, but not only for me personally. If I thought only of myself, you know that I would have been free a long time ago, and I would have been rid of these unsettling anxieties. But I want to see my friend's son, my adversary's son, or any citizen laughing happily from the satisfaction in their lives and enjoying a wealth of freedom because it is the only way human talent reaches its maximum splendor. . .   Oscar Biscet, in a letter to his wife from prison

I was very cheered to find this editorial in the Wall Street Journal. Mary O'Grady won me over a couple of years ago when she first wrote about Oscar Biscet. In one of the few cases of Quid censorship, a commenter on that post said that high abortion rates (and Cuba has the highest rate in the world) are a sign of civilizational advancement. He cited feminist "thought" for that opinion. I had to delete the entry, adding a superfluous warning to those who wish to use my blog to advance such ideas.

In short succession, I then read this piece by Dinesh D'Souza and this one by Theodore Dalrymple. There are many other articles and books now being churned out on the subject of God, or the absence of Him, as Dalrymple notes. What strikes me is the derivative and deeply hypocritical nature of the atheistic argument that a measure of a belief's good is in how few people are inspired to kill for it. We on the right are often accused of being hypocritical about our mores. If someone commits a crime or a "sin" against which he had previously railed, he is a hypocrite. If you are a pragmatist, or infinitely "tolerant" of deviant behavior, you can never be accused of being a hypocrite. The trick is to make sure that hypocrisy is seen by one and all as the worst of all evils, and, if need be, to mislabel growth, maturity, and the simple changing of one's mind as "hypocritical." In the case of mass murder, the leftist/atheist doesn't seem to have a very big problem with the numbers, or even the fact of killing. They have a problem with a belief system that empowers the individual to act for a purpose above himself, and indeed above his commanders. At times, in history, this has lead to Christian holy wars, such as the oft-cited Crusades. The Crusaders were in fact, attacking the Muslims to regain their right to travel to pilgrimage sites. Oh for the days when Christians cared that much about Bethlehem! In any event, the individual soldiers could be consoled knowing that they were defending God, even if the more jaded moderns see them as being mere pawns in the power struggles of men. But what of the atheistic atrocities that litter the 20th century with corpses? In nearly all cases, those who ordered the killings, the deportations, the internal exiles, and those who carried them out, saw a means to power, or mere survival, in this life.

When we look at the question of moral superiority in reverse, "How many lives has religion saved? How many lives has atheism saved?" we are faced with a rather stark picture of the moral and spiritual poverty of atheism. The world is filled with examples of God-inspired goodness that translates directly into lives saved. Can we imagine a world without church-founded hospitals, to take D'Souza's example?.  A sociology professor at the University of Texas, Bob Woodberry, has done pioneering original research into the missionary activity of the 19th and early 20th centuries. By collecting the data kept by missionary societies, he was able to show that the Christian missions (Protestant, non-state sponsored only) in Africa and Asia have had a lasting impact on the societies in their local geographic areas [here, in part, PDF]. To this day, those areas show higher rates of literacy, higher rates of female education, higher numbers of hospital beds per capita, lower rates of infant mortality than surrounding "non-missioned" areas of the same culture. Dr. Xiao Zhao, China's top economist and a Christian convert, noticed the correlation between vibrant economic activity and Christian influence in his travels to South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong. He lived in Hong Kong for six months and at first wondered why the Chinese there were so "civilized." Was it the remnant of the British bureaucracy? He concluded that it was the prevalence of Christian schools, that the Chinese were exposed to "civilizing" ideas at an early age. He has concluded that Christian ideas, including freedom of conscience, including the sanctity of life, were good for the economy [pers. comm.] and that those beneficial effects necessarily extended to non-believers in the same society.

Which brings us back to Oscar Biscet. Dr. Biscet is a devout Christian, a prisoner of conscience in atheistic Cuba. Cuba is never mentioned in the annals of mass murder, but Dr. Biscet would dissent from that convention of the popular historical view.  He is an eyewitness to the brutality of that regime, first as the young girls are taken from their families in deference to the "collective," where they are vulnerable to sexual exploitation, then as they are introduced to the birth control of choice, abortion. The average Cuban woman (girl!) has five abortions before her first live birth. There is only one "moral" test for the correctness of the abortion/ infanticide: that it is a "premature," incomplete pregnancy no matter how advanced and therefore needn't be recorded as live birth and therefore doesn't disturb the official statistics that show Cuba's health care system to be one of the best on earth. If there is no "birth," there is no "death;" there isn't a baby born to a young, unwed, teenaged girl. Infant mortality rates rival those of developed countries- voilá! Michael Moore, how does it feel to shill for mass murder and the torture of infants?

Dr. Biscet is rotting in appalling prison conditions to save the lives of babies.  He has had his chances to be exiled to the comfort of the United States but chooses instead to remain imprisoned for the sake of his countrymen, born and unborn.  Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, et al: where are the atheists?  Fine-tuning the rationales for mass murder? 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

References (2)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
  • Response
    Response: israel tours
    Walk where Jesus walked! and then only you will understand how not to judge others until you have walked their footsteps. Experience the Holy Land.

Reader Comments (2)

Wonderful information. It is really useful to read your web. The information among your blog is strictly wonderful, and your blog structure is Simple kind. It is not dazzled. So great.
July 30, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAir Jordan shoes
Just shows that writing by means of knowledge brings so much depth and relevance to ones readers. Thank you for sharing.
October 8, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterPuma Footwear

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.