Under The Marble Arch
“Seeing what isn’t there is half the job of being on the Left. The other half is changing what isn’t there through costly, intrusive, and ill-conceived initiatives (save 10 percent for keeping Charlie Rangel out of trouble).” -Abe Greenberg, October 9, 2009
Philosopher's Corner

"With their memories of the sixties, when to be young was very heaven, they still believe that an oppositional stance in pursuit of perfection is virtuous in itself—indeed, is the prime or sole content of virtue. And it is this belief that renders them interesting to Hollander, for it makes genuine moral reflection about the nature of various governments and policies impossible. It transforms merely personal discontents into matters of supposedly great general importance."

-Theodore Dalrymple on Paul Hollander: The Only Superpower: Reflections on Strength, Weakness, and Anti-Americanism

Envy the Stupid People
The Leper Colony
  • Peggy Noonan
  • Christopher Buckley
  • Nicole Wallace
  • Steve Schmidt
  • David Brooks
  • David Frum
  • Jeffrey Hart
  • Arlen Specter**
  • Olympia Snowe*
  • Susan Collins*

h/t Red State

*RINO Lepers

**Who says a leper can't change his spots?

Even The Lepers Don't Want Her

Kathleen Parker

Quarantined for Observation

Michael Steele

Search Me
Powered by Squarespace
Read Me

« Is Begging a Free Speech Issue? | Main | First Messiah, Now Prince of Peace Prize »
Monday
12Oct2009

The Princess Of Peace Prize Diaries

The big story today on Fox is the war that the Obama administration has finally decided it had to win.  The good war... the war on Fox News.  Anita Dunn, the administration's media hoohah, came out swinging sometime this weekend (sorry I'm so vague: I'se tired you see, but I couldn't let a good, literary metaphor go to waste):

"Fox News often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party," Dunn said.

I saw the video of Ms. Dunn saying this, and one doesn't want to shoot the messenger but it this case an exception should be made for aesthetic reasons.  That aside, it used to be true that the news outlets did serve a research function- for the citizenry.  Some of the citizens are party members, and so could use whatever news to their advantage.  That's actually a legitimate function of a free press.  Well, never mind: we have to bring the errant Fox News to heel.  It must really chap Obama that he can't just shut them down the way is pals in Venezuela, Iran, and China can.

It really is pathetic.  The President of what was the most powerful nation on earth (before he turned it into Doormatistan, the Peaceprizeable Kingdom) singling out one news outlet because they aren't sufficiently deferential.  Pile the cushions to the sky: a thousand MSNBC's, CNN's, NBC's, and CBS's and the rest of the alphabet soup, complete with tingly-legged, man-crushing bedfellows, and our dainty Princess President will toss and turn because of the pea of Fox News.

Now that I think about it, it's even more pathetic that so-called news outlets have volunteered to become what journalists in other countries are forced to do.

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (1)

"[...] shut them down the way is pals in Venezuela, Iran, and China can." Don't forget Argentina: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h70XfVfDj4pFHawUTDaI5N45zCKA

As thin-skinned as he is, maybe we should start calling him President Onion.
October 13, 2009 | Unregistered Commenteraelfheld

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.