Ted Cruz for Senate
Under The Marble Arch
"I slept and dreamt that life was Joy.
I woke and saw that life was Duty.
I acted, and behold, Duty was Joy."
Rabindranath Tagore

"The skepticism about human rationality that science inspires should not be taken as support for authoritarianism or paternalism… On the contrary, it should render questionable all claims to wise and disinterested leadership, including those of America’s own altruistic progressive technocrats who propose policies to “nudge” the unenlightened masses into doing the right thing. It makes more sense to think of our leaders and intellectuals as half-crazed hooting howler monkeys — just like the rest of us."
Michael Lind, Salon, August 23,2011
“Seeing what isn’t there is half the job of being on the Left. The other half is changing what isn’t there through costly, intrusive, and ill-conceived initiatives (save 10 percent for keeping Charlie Rangel out of trouble).” -Abe Greenberg, October 9, 2009
“To date, what non-Obama voters see, and fear, is a candidate content to coast to the nomination and then conduct a blandly conservative campaign. They want a more substantive choice than that. They want to have it out over the worth or danger of Barack Obama’s ideas. They want the chance to ratify Washington’s enormous long-term claims on the country’s wealth, or decisively reject them." – Daniel Henninger, WSJ, July 21, 2011
Search Me
Powered by Squarespace
Books!
  • The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction
    The Line Through the Heart: Natural Law as Fact, Theory, and Sign of Contradiction
    by J. Budziszewski
  • The Spiritual Combat Revisited
    The Spiritual Combat Revisited
    by Fr Jonathan Robinson, Jonathan Robinson
« A Witness to Child Rape | Main | "Schadenfreude" Doesn't Quite Capture It »
Tuesday
Nov082011

The Republican Move On Dot Org

Re: Herman Cain.  Can we just move on, please?

I know it's hard.  Part of you is completely infuriated that Gloria Allred and Politico are doing what the Left always does to Republican front runners: look for the sex angle and go crazy as though even they considered it newsworthy or even actionable on any level.  Which they don't.  All that crap about Bill Clinton?  From a liberal's point of view, his bimbo eruptions were practically a qualification for the job.  Subliminally, they made his rather sterile marriage OK: every tried and true lefty loves the idea of subverting marriage while suckering the bourgeois voters into believing that there is some residual feeling for the foundational institution for individual freedom.  

But I digress.  The other part of you is enraged that nothing that has been reported so far, and I even contend this includes the latest accuser who happens to break form by being an actual person as opposed to an anonymous figment, is anything that should figure into our assessment of Herman Cain as a candidate.  Nothing.  Not even the believability of Ms. Bialek's account, which sounds pretty good once you've dusted it off after of 14 years of being completely secret.  I understand that she didn't tell anyone the details of the encounter with Cain at the time: wow, that's some secret.  But now he's famous and she wants a piece of that action, I guess.  Certainly, that's how Gloria Allred makes her living, so the sterling characters of all involved are assured.

The greater scandal by far is that conservatives were willing to shove Herman Cain up in the polls to make him a big fat juicy target to begin with.  Apparently, Mitt Romney is so gawdawful frightening that a man who has never held elective office, who is incoherent on just about anything that doesn't include the number nine, whose grasp of world affairs is not even as good a Barry "I Lived In Indonesia" Obama, is a more attractive as a nominee.

Fellow conservatives, stay on message.  If you want even the tiniest sliver of credibility, go with the evergreen Newt Gingrich.  Learn to stop worrying and love the Bomb, and his lovely Platinum Helmet-Haired third wife.  Better still, support Jon Huntsman.  He has an actual record of success in governing that lasted somewhat longer than Newt's, with the added bonus of only one wife to keep track of.  Also, as a "NotRomney", his credentials are impeccable.

If you want a bigger sliver of credibility, indeed, honor, go with Rick Santorum, who is a true martyr of principle, whose only major and rather ghastly mistake was endorsing Arlen Specter.  Arlen's gone, but not before Rick, and Twomey's in: forgive, forgive, forgive.

But if you want to win, quit your whining, tell Herman to come back when he's figured out that China has been a nuclear power for nearly 50 years and that he really won't release all of the Gitmo detainees for one U.S. soldier, etc., etc., etc.  Do not support ignorance.  Do your best with the candidates who are disturbed by our national debt, who know where are troops are, and who have a passing acquaintance with discipline, and whose baggage has been thoroughly pawed, fondled, and sniffed by our friends on the Left.

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

Reader Comments (1)

Cain is done. The polls are just slow in catching up.
November 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRachel

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.