Under The Marble Arch
“Seeing what isn’t there is half the job of being on the Left. The other half is changing what isn’t there through costly, intrusive, and ill-conceived initiatives (save 10 percent for keeping Charlie Rangel out of trouble).” -Abe Greenberg, October 9, 2009
Philosopher's Corner

"With their memories of the sixties, when to be young was very heaven, they still believe that an oppositional stance in pursuit of perfection is virtuous in itself—indeed, is the prime or sole content of virtue. And it is this belief that renders them interesting to Hollander, for it makes genuine moral reflection about the nature of various governments and policies impossible. It transforms merely personal discontents into matters of supposedly great general importance."

-Theodore Dalrymple on Paul Hollander: The Only Superpower: Reflections on Strength, Weakness, and Anti-Americanism

Envy the Stupid People
The Leper Colony
  • Peggy Noonan
  • Christopher Buckley
  • Nicole Wallace
  • Steve Schmidt
  • David Brooks
  • David Frum
  • Jeffrey Hart
  • Arlen Specter**
  • Olympia Snowe*
  • Susan Collins*

h/t Red State

*RINO Lepers

**Who says a leper can't change his spots?

Even The Lepers Don't Want Her

Kathleen Parker

Quarantined for Observation

Michael Steele

Search Me
Powered by Squarespace
Read Me

Entries in ethics (1)

Monday
09Mar2009

Obama, Slayer of Babies

I heard and read part of Obama's announcement about stem cell research and I only have a couple of things to say about that.  First, he made some passing references to ethics and "concerns" but the gloss indicates that he's not deeply troubled by ethics where pre-alive babies are concerned.  We knew that.

Second, I have a deep admiration for George Bush's seriousness on matters of human life.  I heard Charles Krauthammer speak about his stint on the President's Council on Bioethics, and, while he personally didn't draw the line where George Bush did (CK favored using embryos left over from invitro treatments), he too admired the depth of GWB's thinking on this issue, and said that his August 2001 speech was the best presidential speech on the subject ever.  So Obama's facile dismissal of Bush's policy as placing moral values before sound science is just plain, self-serving distortion.

Well, as with so much of emanating from the White House, we knew this going in.  Any man who would vote against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act is a pro-abortion, pro-infanticide radical.  He doesn't have to trouble his pretty, graying little head about niceties of ethics.  Ethics are for us knuckle-dragging Neanderthals who don't mind being punished with babies.