Under The Marble Arch
“Seeing what isn’t there is half the job of being on the Left. The other half is changing what isn’t there through costly, intrusive, and ill-conceived initiatives (save 10 percent for keeping Charlie Rangel out of trouble).” -Abe Greenberg, October 9, 2009
Philosopher's Corner

"With their memories of the sixties, when to be young was very heaven, they still believe that an oppositional stance in pursuit of perfection is virtuous in itself—indeed, is the prime or sole content of virtue. And it is this belief that renders them interesting to Hollander, for it makes genuine moral reflection about the nature of various governments and policies impossible. It transforms merely personal discontents into matters of supposedly great general importance."

-Theodore Dalrymple on Paul Hollander: The Only Superpower: Reflections on Strength, Weakness, and Anti-Americanism

Envy the Stupid People
The Leper Colony
  • Peggy Noonan
  • Christopher Buckley
  • Nicole Wallace
  • Steve Schmidt
  • David Brooks
  • David Frum
  • Jeffrey Hart
  • Arlen Specter**
  • Olympia Snowe*
  • Susan Collins*

h/t Red State

*RINO Lepers

**Who says a leper can't change his spots?

Even The Lepers Don't Want Her

Kathleen Parker

Quarantined for Observation

Michael Steele

Search Me
Powered by Squarespace
Read Me

Entries in Heather-MacDonald (1)

Wednesday
15Oct2008

In Response to Heather MacDonald

Gettin' all Mavericky, in City Journal, by Heather MacDonald.

I called into the Laura Ingraham Show this morning because I disagreed with the trajectory of this article.  On re-reading it, I find much to agree with.  But, I bow to a political reality, and that is that John McCain's own weaknesses drove this choice, and it was a good one for this political season.  I think that Sarah Palin has demonstrated executive acumen in a way that no one else on either ticket has.  I think that she is unripe for the national stage, however.  As for her family circumstances, especially her daughter's pregnancy, perhaps it is caving to embrace that as wholeheartedly as the operatives have, but I can tell you from personal experience, my own reaction when a girl takes the baby to term: Thank God.  Then: so, why isn't she married already?

And I think that's the reality "on the ground," as they say.  We are willing to swallow a lot because we see a glimpse of potential, a home-grown conservative,  one not schooled in the academic "principles" but one who simply embodies many of our cherished ideals through her life: hard work, determination, and a record of making her government more "of the people."  And she is self-made, and very liberated for all that.

She's leaning heavily on a certain populism, possibly to deflect attention from her scant background in finance and the economy, for example.  But I look at those other three also running for office, and with all their years, they are more culpable for the current mess, and equally clueless about how to fix it.  That is, clueless about how to fix it while preserving the liberties of the free market, capitalism, and property rights.

It is a part of a great intellectual and political heritage that we can express opposition even within our own party, (and our subset: conservatives.) But it's painful to have someone like you, logical, knowledgeable, and thoughtful, take your shots when The Daily Kos is urging its acolytes to "crush" us and "break our backs."

In the end, that may be Sarah Palin's most winning way: she is indomitable.  A rare commodity among conservatives these days.